Bug 5614 - TCK expects JobExecution to be updated as job runs
TCK expects JobExecution to be updated as job runs
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: jbatch
Classification: Unclassified
Component: TCK
1
All All
: P5 major
: ---
Assigned To: ScottKurz
tck_1.0
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-12-03 23:08 UTC by mminella
Modified: 2014-01-03 03:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description mminella 2013-12-03 23:08:18 UTC
This is essentially re-opening of 5371.  The TCK expects that a JobExecution is being updated behind the scenes instead of getting a new instance before checking the state.  The list below is what I have currently identified and will add tests to this list as I find more.

* JobOperatorTests#testInvokeJobWithUserStop()
* ParallelExecutionTests#testStopRunningPartitionedStep()
* ParallelExecutionTests#testStopRestartRunningPartitionedStep()
* StopOrFailOnExitStatusWithRestartTests#testInvokeJobWithUserStopAndRestart()

My guess is that most of the places JobOperatorBridge#*AndWaitForResult are called will need updates.
Comment 1 ScottKurz 2014-01-03 03:42:22 UTC
Fixed all these and will also mention that I found another similar issue with the testInvokeJobWithUserStopAndRestart() test.

If we're going to look at the BatchStatus before waiting for a terminating status, then we should allow we might see a status of STARTING (we'd been expecting STARTED).   Fixed this as well.