glassfish
  1. glassfish
  2. GLASSFISH-7045

What is the story of updater center for OpenSolaris or Ubuntu?

    Details

    • Type: New Feature New Feature
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Critical Critical
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: V3
    • Fix Version/s: not determined
    • Component/s: update_center
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      Operating System: All
      Platform: Macintosh

    • Issuezilla Id:
      7,045

      Description

      With opensolaris official IPS repo or Ubuntu packages, what is the story for our
      update center...
      While IPS is a shared tech with opensolaris and GlassFish, the update centers
      are differents, and cannot be mixed and matched (different code base for top dir
      install).
      For Unbuntu, the GF UC should./must not be able to update the GF installed bits
      in system install location. Only Ubuntu UC can do that.

      Further more, the Admin GUI has hard coded Update Center UI talking to the GF uc.
      What will admin gui shows if the product is natively installed on OpenSolaris or
      Unbuntu? The Ubuntu Update Center? A Mix of add-ons via GF update Center and
      patchs from native repository?
      For openSolaris, the user will have 2 separate pkg commands?. User experience?

      Need clarification.

        Activity

        ludo created issue -
        Hide
        Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic added a comment -

        Changing status to "feature" - needs discussion and spec, not the bug fix

        Show
        Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic added a comment - Changing status to "feature" - needs discussion and spec, not the bug fix
        Hide
        ludo added a comment -

        historically, moves like that are needed for a clean bug dashboard, so that
        nobody sees the issue, so that we can ship the product without implementing the
        feature.

        Tell me it is not true for this feature: it is a must have for FCS...

        Show
        ludo added a comment - historically, moves like that are needed for a clean bug dashboard, so that nobody sees the issue, so that we can ship the product without implementing the feature. Tell me it is not true for this feature: it is a must have for FCS...
        Hide
        ludo added a comment -

        Are we going to address this rfe?

        Anyone working on a merged provisioning system for IPS (i.e stop using SVR4 to
        populate native IPS?), and a BASEDIR changeable at install time, depending on
        the target (i.e IPS native or GF IPS user centric?)

        Show
        ludo added a comment - Are we going to address this rfe? Anyone working on a merged provisioning system for IPS (i.e stop using SVR4 to populate native IPS?), and a BASEDIR changeable at install time, depending on the target (i.e IPS native or GF IPS user centric?)
        kenaiadmin made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        issue.field.bugzillaimportkey 7045 38649
        Hide
        Tom Mueller added a comment -

        Bulk update to change fix version to "not determined" for all issues still open but with a fix version for a released version.

        Show
        Tom Mueller added a comment - Bulk update to change fix version to "not determined" for all issues still open but with a fix version for a released version.
        Tom Mueller made changes -
        Fix Version/s not determined [ 11149 ]
        Fix Version/s V3 [ 10981 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic
            Reporter:
            ludo
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated: