javamoney
  1. javamoney
  2. JAVAMONEY-64

Maven dependency is broken 'javax.money:jsr354-api:0.7'

    Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      On this page said:

      Neverhtless this API is accessible by configuring the macen dependency:

      <dependency>
      <groupId>javax.money</groupId>
      <artifactId>jsr354-api</artifactId>
      <version>0.7</version>
      </dependency>

      It isn't true, I can't find this JAR in any repositories.

      PS: typo "maCen"

        Activity

        Hide
        keilw added a comment - - edited

        There are already several Github pages, e.g. http://javamoney.github.io/jsr354-ri/ we should try to leverage those instead of duplication. While the java.net project is also code-named JavaMoney for historical purposes, if we still want to maintain news and updates around the Spec on java.net that sounds fair, but for RI, TCK and the JavaMoney Open Source project (which took over most of the JSRs original scope) that should be done on GitHub only. A link-list seems unnecessary effort with individual folders, a single page would be enough.

        As for Joda, especially JSR 310 is one of the most bizarre examples how NOT do to this. Here on java.net there's
        https://java.net/projects/jsr-310/ pointing to http://threeten.sourceforge.net/. That again claims, everything is now on GitHub, where the actual JSR page vanished because JSR 310 is not a real JSR any more, everything has been sucked into OpenJDK HG ;-/

        What a mess, and perfect Lesson Learned on what we must avoid here (some day, but not with 1.0 we could face partial OpenJDK integration, but let's worry about after this one went Final )

        P.s.: I just saw the javamoney.java.net page is NAKED and only shows HTTP sub-folders. Could we please try pointing that URL to https://javamoney.java.net/api/ instead?! The other pages are practically empty and see GitHub.io pages useless for most parts.

        Besides, this looks like a slithly "abused" thread, the issue had nothing to do with a Wiki or Web page.
        Following the success of Agorava.org, the way Antoine did that (asked him about it earlier) seems like a good pattern for a Github site (not a sub-project one like some of the repositories use already) used by javamoney.org. Until then javamoney.org simply points to the lib project, given the java.net page is a bit disfunctional at the moment

        Werner

        Show
        keilw added a comment - - edited There are already several Github pages, e.g. http://javamoney.github.io/jsr354-ri/ we should try to leverage those instead of duplication. While the java.net project is also code-named JavaMoney for historical purposes, if we still want to maintain news and updates around the Spec on java.net that sounds fair, but for RI, TCK and the JavaMoney Open Source project (which took over most of the JSRs original scope) that should be done on GitHub only. A link-list seems unnecessary effort with individual folders, a single page would be enough. As for Joda, especially JSR 310 is one of the most bizarre examples how NOT do to this. Here on java.net there's https://java.net/projects/jsr-310/ pointing to http://threeten.sourceforge.net/ . That again claims, everything is now on GitHub, where the actual JSR page vanished because JSR 310 is not a real JSR any more, everything has been sucked into OpenJDK HG ;-/ What a mess, and perfect Lesson Learned on what we must avoid here (some day, but not with 1.0 we could face partial OpenJDK integration, but let's worry about after this one went Final ) P.s.: I just saw the javamoney.java.net page is NAKED and only shows HTTP sub-folders. Could we please try pointing that URL to https://javamoney.java.net/api/ instead?! The other pages are practically empty and see GitHub.io pages useless for most parts. Besides, this looks like a slithly "abused" thread, the issue had nothing to do with a Wiki or Web page. Following the success of Agorava.org, the way Antoine did that (asked him about it earlier) seems like a good pattern for a Github site (not a sub-project one like some of the repositories use already) used by javamoney.org. Until then javamoney.org simply points to the lib project, given the java.net page is a bit disfunctional at the moment Werner
        Hide
        chrispheby added a comment -

        Interesting dimensions to the discussion, but have we reached a decision. For the time being, I just need an agreed location (accessible via WebDAV / SSH) for publishing the Maven site as a multi-module project. We can finetune the mechanism and the structure when the basics are working?

        Thanks Chris

        Show
        chrispheby added a comment - Interesting dimensions to the discussion, but have we reached a decision. For the time being, I just need an agreed location (accessible via WebDAV / SSH) for publishing the Maven site as a multi-module project. We can finetune the mechanism and the structure when the basics are working? Thanks Chris
        Hide
        chrispheby added a comment -

        I think we didn't get an agreement on site location... how about I go ahead to arrange a Maven central release and omit the site publication?

        Show
        chrispheby added a comment - I think we didn't get an agreement on site location... how about I go ahead to arrange a Maven central release and omit the site publication?
        Hide
        chrispheby added a comment -

        I think either Anatole or Werner published to central.

        Release artifact is:

        <dependency>
        <groupId>org.javamoney</groupId>
        <artifactId>moneta</artifactId>
        <version>0.8</version>
        </dependency>

        Show
        chrispheby added a comment - I think either Anatole or Werner published to central. Release artifact is: <dependency> <groupId>org.javamoney</groupId> <artifactId>moneta</artifactId> <version>0.8</version> </dependency>
        Hide
        chrispheby added a comment -

        Now a Jar is published in Maven Central I have added some Hibernate mappings into Usertype - see https://jadira.atlassian.net/browse/JDF-76

        Show
        chrispheby added a comment - Now a Jar is published in Maven Central I have added some Hibernate mappings into Usertype - see https://jadira.atlassian.net/browse/JDF-76

          People

          • Assignee:
            chrispheby
            Reporter:
            stokito
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: