Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Affects Version/s: 1.1
    • Fix Version/s: 2.2
    • Component/s: Components/Renderers
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      Operating System: All
      Platform: All

    • Issuezilla Id:
      127
    • Status Whiteboard:
      Hide

      EGTop5 effort_easy cat2 javadoc sig size_small importance_large draft

      Show
      EGTop5 effort_easy cat2 javadoc sig size_small importance_large draft

      Description

      Currently, <h:form> doesn't allow you to either post to a different URL, or
      change the method. For situations where the developer needs to post to a non-JSF
      UI, it should be possible to do so using <h:form> or another UIForm derivative.
      The same argument holds for posting via HTTPS.

      As an example, see http://myfaces.apache.org/sandbox/form.html.

        Activity

        kito75 created issue -
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        This seems reasonable, we'll consider it for the next spec rev.

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - This seems reasonable, we'll consider it for the next spec rev.
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        EGTop5

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - EGTop5
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        easy

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - easy
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        Missed it, push to 2.1

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - Missed it, push to 2.1
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        Prepare to delete "spec" subcomponent.

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - Prepare to delete "spec" subcomponent.
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        Move these to unscheduled because we need to target them correctly. 2.next isn't
        specific enough.

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - Move these to unscheduled because we need to target them correctly. 2.next isn't specific enough.
        Hide
        rogerk added a comment -

        cat2

        Show
        rogerk added a comment - cat2
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        javadoc

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - javadoc
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        Sig change, new property on UIForm

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - Sig change, new property on UIForm
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        These are targeted at 2.1.

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - These are targeted at 2.1.
        Hide
        sheetalv added a comment -

        triage

        Show
        sheetalv added a comment - triage
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        rogerk

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - rogerk
        Hide
        rogerk added a comment -

        target

        Show
        rogerk added a comment - target
        Hide
        rogerk added a comment -

        re-target

        Show
        rogerk added a comment - re-target
        Hide
        rogerk added a comment -

        Not enough time for 2.1 given the more important issues.
        Kito - you are welcome to submit the required spec changes if you want this in
        for 2.1.

        Show
        rogerk added a comment - Not enough time for 2.1 given the more important issues. Kito - you are welcome to submit the required spec changes if you want this in for 2.1.
        Hide
        rogerk added a comment -

        triage

        Show
        rogerk added a comment - triage
        kenaiadmin made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        issue.field.bugzillaimportkey 127 19732
        Ed Burns made changes -
        Status Whiteboard EGTop5 effort_easy cat2 javadoc sig size_small importance_large EGTop5 effort_easy cat2 javadoc sig size_small importance_large draft
        Ed Burns made changes -
        Assignee rogerk [ rogerk ]
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        I think this should be handled by another component, and leave <h:form> for postback as it does now.

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - I think this should be handled by another component, and leave <h:form> for postback as it does now.
        Ed Burns made changes -
        Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Resolution Won't Fix [ 2 ]
        Hide
        Manfred Riem added a comment -

        Closing resolved issue out

        Show
        Manfred Riem added a comment - Closing resolved issue out
        Manfred Riem made changes -
        Status Resolved [ 5 ] Closed [ 6 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            kito75
          • Votes:
            2 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: