HA> 9.2.2 still lists verbatim as a requirement, but I believe Ryan showed
HA> that it wasn't need in any use-case.
We'll fix that in an errata and we'll mention it in the Implementation
Is that acceptable?
JH> I think f:verbatim still has semantic importance as it relates to
JH> ResponseWriter. Maybe within JSP, it's a non-issue at this point,
JH> but we actually ended up adding it to Facelets because people
JH> wanted the content taken as verbatim without being processed as
JH> events within the ResponseWriter (ie writeText vs. write)
We'll keep it in the spec, we'll just no longer say it is necessary. Is
that acceptable Jacob?