Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 1.2
    • Fix Version/s: 1.2
    • Component/s: Uncategorized
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      Operating System: All
      Platform: All

    • Issuezilla Id:
      167

      Description

      HA> 9.2.2 still lists verbatim as a requirement, but I believe Ryan showed
      HA> that it wasn't need in any use-case.

      We'll fix that in an errata and we'll mention it in the Implementation
      Relnotes.

      Is that acceptable?

      Ed

      JH> I think f:verbatim still has semantic importance as it relates to
      JH> ResponseWriter. Maybe within JSP, it's a non-issue at this point,
      JH> but we actually ended up adding it to Facelets because people
      JH> wanted the content taken as verbatim without being processed as
      JH> events within the ResponseWriter (ie writeText vs. write)

      We'll keep it in the spec, we'll just no longer say it is necessary. Is
      that acceptable Jacob?

      Ed

        Activity

        Hide
        rogerk added a comment -

        Section 9.2.2

        Removed the paragraph (bullet item) about f:verbatim
        requirement for template text included via jsp:include or c:import....

        Spec edits checked in.

        Show
        rogerk added a comment - Section 9.2.2 Removed the paragraph (bullet item) about f:verbatim requirement for template text included via jsp:include or c:import.... Spec edits checked in.
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        Prepare to delete "spec" subcomponent.

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - Prepare to delete "spec" subcomponent.
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        Move all to 1.2

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - Move all to 1.2
        Hide
        Manfred Riem added a comment -

        Closing resolved issue out

        Show
        Manfred Riem added a comment - Closing resolved issue out

          People

          • Assignee:
            rogerk
            Reporter:
            rogerk
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: