javaserverfaces-spec-public
  1. javaserverfaces-spec-public
  2. JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-652

Clarify what happens when nesting and wrapping f:ajax tags collide

    Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 2.0
    • Fix Version/s: 2.0 Rev a
    • Component/s: Ajax/JavaScript
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      Operating System: All
      Platform: Macintosh

    • Issuezilla Id:
      652
    • Status Whiteboard:
      Hide

      cat1 frame changelog

      Show
      cat1 frame changelog

      Description

      If the following kind of scenario is detected:

      <f:ajax event="click">
      <h:inputText> <f:ajax event="click" /> </h:inputText
      </f:ajax>

      An informative error should be put up. Perhaps ProjectStage should be used here.

        Activity

        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        Prepare to delete "spec" subcomponent.

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - Prepare to delete "spec" subcomponent.
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        cat1

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - cat1
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        frame

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - frame
        Hide
        rogerk added a comment -

        In the case of an outer f:ajax and a nested f:ajax, each with the same event
        type, the nested one overrides the outer one. A spec clarification is needed in
        section 10.4.1.1 that gives an example and it states the expected outcome.

        Show
        rogerk added a comment - In the case of an outer f:ajax and a nested f:ajax, each with the same event type, the nested one overrides the outer one. A spec clarification is needed in section 10.4.1.1 that gives an example and it states the expected outcome.
        Hide
        rogerk added a comment -

        ownership

        Show
        rogerk added a comment - ownership
        Hide
        Ed Burns added a comment -

        These are valid 2.0 Rev a issues

        Show
        Ed Burns added a comment - These are valid 2.0 Rev a issues
        Hide
        rogerk added a comment -

        I've added a concrete example with some text in section 10.4.1.1 of the
        specification.

        Show
        rogerk added a comment - I've added a concrete example with some text in section 10.4.1.1 of the specification.
        Hide
        rogerk added a comment -

        changelog

        Show
        rogerk added a comment - changelog
        Hide
        Manfred Riem added a comment -

        Closing resolved issue out

        Show
        Manfred Riem added a comment - Closing resolved issue out

          People

          • Assignee:
            rogerk
            Reporter:
            Ed Burns
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: