jcpnext4
  1. jcpnext4
  2. JCPNEXT4-10

Verify that Process Doc definitions don't conflict with those in the JSPA

    Details

    • Type: Task Task
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The summary says it all. Since we're not modifying the JSPA in this JSR we must be careful not to introduce definitions that conflict with the equivalent definitions in the JSPA.

      We need to conduct a review to verify this.

      (Copied from JSR 358)

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          heathervc added a comment -

          Patrick will review and John Weir has volunteered to review the output.

          Show
          heathervc added a comment - Patrick will review and John Weir has volunteered to review the output.
          Hide
          pcurran added a comment -

          I've reviewed the latest version of the Process Document and found no conflicts. Where a definition exists in both the JSPA version has usually been copied directly into the Process Document. There are some necessary changes to accommodate the new membership classes, and in a couple of other cases the wording has been changed slightly without changing the meaning, but that's all.

          We should keep this issue open to ensure that we check again before Final Release but as far as Public Review is concerned we're good to go.

          Show
          pcurran added a comment - I've reviewed the latest version of the Process Document and found no conflicts. Where a definition exists in both the JSPA version has usually been copied directly into the Process Document. There are some necessary changes to accommodate the new membership classes, and in a couple of other cases the wording has been changed slightly without changing the meaning, but that's all. We should keep this issue open to ensure that we check again before Final Release but as far as Public Review is concerned we're good to go.
          Hide
          heathervc added a comment -

          We have verified this for now, go back and check again before Final Release before closing.

          Show
          heathervc added a comment - We have verified this for now, go back and check again before Final Release before closing.

            People

            • Assignee:
              pcurran
              Reporter:
              pcurran
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: