16 - strike "(with no need for a second)". Unusual rule, and requires EC agreement anyhow, so a second is not unreasonable, especially since it is so strongly discouraged
PC> We made this choice deliberately. If one member is unable/unwilling to process a "surprise" item that should be sufficient to postpone it. EC agreement is not needed, so I agree that the wording "the EC may agree to go into private session" is confusing and should be changed. Please log an issue with a specific suggestion for change.
SS> my first suggestion (strike need for second) stands. change "may agree" above to "must agree"