jsr348
  1. jsr348
  2. JSR348-129

EC votes are just advice? problem: advice can be ignored

    Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Component/s: Standing Rules
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      standing rules:

      104 - Strike 104-105. Advice to whom? This provides a "veto" to the party to which the "advice" is directed. For example, if the EC votes for sanctions against a spec lead to remedy an wrong raised during an appeal by an EG member, the spec lead may choose to simply ignore the "advice".

      PC> The original intent was "advice to the PMO" which we've agreed should stand. However, I agree that we now have ambiguities because there are other decisions that should be binding. We need to resolve this. Please file a separate issue.

        Activity

        Hide
        pcurran added a comment -

        Fixed

        Show
        pcurran added a comment - Fixed
        Hide
        pcurran added a comment -

        I modified the relevant section of the Standing Rules to read:

        "All EC decisions are to be understood as being advisory in nature except as they pertain to formal Ballots as defined in the Process Document."

        I think this clarifies things...

        Show
        pcurran added a comment - I modified the relevant section of the Standing Rules to read: "All EC decisions are to be understood as being advisory in nature except as they pertain to formal Ballots as defined in the Process Document." I think this clarifies things...

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            sean_sheedy
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: