jsr348
  1. jsr348
  2. JSR348-130

abstentions are embodiment of agreement to disagree

    Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Component/s: Standing Rules
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      standing rules

      109-110 - strike "Explicit abstentions are strongly discouraged" as members may choose to step aside rather than block progress; yeah, the "minimum 5 yes votes" rule may kick in, but if it does it's a strong sign that something about what's being voted on needs to be fixed.

      PC> I disagree. Abstentions are strongly discouraged. This doesn't mean they are prohibited. We could soften by striking "discouraged."

      SS> why strongly discouraged? permits members to respectfully disagree without blocking the process. how about "Abstentions should be avoided, but can be used, for example, by a member who objects to that being voted on, but wishes not to stand in the way of the process."

        Activity

        sean_sheedy created issue -
        pcurran made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        pcurran made changes -
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Status Resolved [ 5 ] Reopened [ 4 ]
        pcurran made changes -
        Status Reopened [ 4 ] Closed [ 6 ]
        Assignee pcurran [ pcurran ]
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        pcurran made changes -
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Status Closed [ 6 ] Reopened [ 4 ]
        pcurran made changes -
        Status Reopened [ 4 ] Closed [ 6 ]
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            pcurran
            Reporter:
            sean_sheedy
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: