Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      as this might be lost in the comment of JSR_333-57 : can we add the filter parameter to Node.getNodeNames too? it would make sense and should be cheap to implement, all the logic will be there from Node.getNodes anyways.

        Activity

        Hide
        Peeter Piegaze added a comment -

        I agree. I will make the required changes.

        Show
        Peeter Piegaze added a comment - I agree. I will make the required changes.
        Hide
        dbu added a comment -

        just created the pull request on PHPCR https://github.com/phpcr/phpcr/pull/57

        Show
        dbu added a comment - just created the pull request on PHPCR https://github.com/phpcr/phpcr/pull/57
        Hide
        Peeter Piegaze added a comment -

        I have added the following new method sigs:

        StringIterator Node.getNodeNames(String namePattern)

        StringIterator Node.getNodeNames(String[] nameGlobs)

        Show
        Peeter Piegaze added a comment - I have added the following new method sigs: StringIterator Node.getNodeNames(String namePattern) StringIterator Node.getNodeNames(String[] nameGlobs)
        Hide
        dbu added a comment -

        cool, thanks. in php its all in one method, like Node::getNodes()

        Show
        dbu added a comment - cool, thanks. in php its all in one method, like Node::getNodes()

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            dbu
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: