[GLASSFISH-2276] <BT6518990>Need a better directory tree structure to arrange different component samples Created: 31/Jan/07  Updated: 06/Mar/12

Status: Open
Project: glassfish
Component/s: sample_apps
Affects Version/s: 9.1pe
Fix Version/s: not determined

Type: Bug Priority: Minor
Reporter: gfbugbridge Assignee: msreddy
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified
Environment:

Operating System: All
Platform: All


Issuezilla Id: 2,276

 Description   

*********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq*********************
Inside SWAN :http://swsblweb1.central.sun.com:8080/CrPrint?id=6518990
Outside SWAN :http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6518990
**********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq Ends********
*********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq*********************
Description I am testing SDK b05 (app platforms).
When I installed the SDK build, I see many samples are put directly under samples
directory, it makes the tree structure not so clean.

Could we add a subcomponent name as a subdirectory under samples directory, just
like the way we arranged the javaee5 samples.

Suggested directory tree:
.../samples/subcomname/differentsamples

I mark this issue as P2 since I feel if we decide to fix then it is better to fix in
Beta.

**********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq Ends********
*********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq*********************
Description Hi Sreeni:
Here are the info requested:

  • sdk build which is used: It is SDK b05
  • what components were selected: This bug is regarding to all the components. We
    should have a sub directory under samples directory.
  • list of samples: Here are the samples we have under samples directory, as you
    can see there is no component sub directory, I like the way you arranged javaee5,
    so I suggest other component sample should also follow this way.

d:\AppServer Install\sdkup3pv\samples>ls
atomserver common.properties jsf-extensions wadl
blogapps index.html phobos
bp-project javaee5 quickstart
common-ant.xml jmaki rest-impl

**********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq Ends********
*********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq*********************
Justification Priority changed from [] to [2-High]a better tree structure to arrange the sample XXXXXX 2007-01-30 02:40:26 GMT

**********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq Ends********



 Comments   
Comment by gfbugbridge [ 08/Mar/07 ]

*********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq*********************
Inside SWAN :http://swsblweb1.central.sun.com:8080/CrPrint?id=6518990
Outside SWAN :http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6518990
**********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq Ends********
*********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq*********************
Description I am testing SDK b05 (app platforms).
When I installed the SDK build, I see many samples are put directly under samples
directory, it makes the tree structure not so clean.

Could we add a subcomponent name as a subdirectory under samples directory, just
like the way we arranged the javaee5 samples.

Suggested directory tree:
.../samples/subcomname/differentsamples

I mark this issue as P2 since I feel if we decide to fix then it is better to fix in
Beta.

**********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq Ends********
*********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq*********************
Description Hi Sreeni:
Here are the info requested:

  • sdk build which is used: It is SDK b05
  • what components were selected: This bug is regarding to all the components. We
    should have a sub directory under samples directory.
  • list of samples: Here are the samples we have under samples directory, as you
    can see there is no component sub directory, I like the way you arranged javaee5,
    so I suggest other component sample should also follow this way.

d:\AppServer Install\sdkup3pv\samples>ls
atomserver common.properties jsf-extensions wadl
blogapps index.html phobos
bp-project javaee5 quickstart
common-ant.xml jmaki rest-impl

**********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq Ends********
*********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq*********************
Evaluation I am
**********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq Ends********
*********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq*********************
Justification Priority changed from [] to [2-High]a better tree structure to arrange the sample XXXXXX 2007-01-30 02:40:26 GMT

Priority changed from [2-High] to [3-Medium]
it is ok to fix this in XXXXXX 2007-03-07 23:41:55 GMT

**********READ-ONLY Data from Bugtraq Ends********

Comment by sanandal [ 11/Jan/09 ]

"Reclassifying as P4 because this issue is not deemed "must fix" for this v2.1
release whose primary release driver is SailFin.
This issue will be scrubbed after this release and will be given the right
priority for the next release."

Comment by Tom Mueller [ 06/Mar/12 ]

Bulk update to change fix version to "not determined" for all issues still open but with a fix version for a released version.

Generated at Wed Sep 02 06:54:08 UTC 2015 using JIRA 6.2.3#6260-sha1:63ef1d6dac3f4f4d7db4c1effd405ba38ccdc558.