UIData needs review on a couple of fronts (JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-935)

[JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-963] Alignment/extending of iterating ui components Created: 01/Apr/11  Updated: 01/Aug/14

Status: Open
Project: javaserverfaces-spec-public
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: 2.2
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Sub-task Priority: Major
Reporter: Mathias Werlitz Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 4
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Status Whiteboard:

size_medium importance_small


UIRepeat and UIData do pretty much the same: iterate over a collection of items. There should be a common base class for this, encapsulating the complicated logic for saving/restoring and iterating the state of the "rows". Something like "UIIterate".

Writing iterating components is very complicated at the moment. This base class should be easy to extend and also support any kind of data structures, not only "lists". Using an integer for the "row" iterating index is insufficient for creating "tree" components. A string or kind of indexing object would be much more flexible.

UIRepeat and UIData could extend this class and provide the existing interface on top of it.

Comment by Mathias Werlitz [ 21/Apr/11 ]

Well the essential difference between UIData(<h:dataTable>) and UIRepeat is how the iteration is done during render response.
UIRepeat iterates in the component and HtmlDataTable iterates in the renderer. This flexibility should be possible. Iterating in the renderer can be easier for "tree" components.

I could imagine a structure like this:

|- UISequentialIterate
| |
| |- UIData
| |- UIRepeat
|- UITree?

At least there should be an marking interface for such components because state saving seems to be different when nesting of iterating components is possible. For example UIRepeat already checks for UIData or UIRepeat parents. UIData does only look for itself as a parent.

Comment by Ed Burns [ 22/Apr/11 ]

I thought we had an issue for this, but yes, it's a good idea.

Comment by arjan tijms [ 27/Mar/14 ]

I think is a very important issue. In general UIData seems to be more robust than UIRepeat, but they indeed do pretty much the same thing and when inspecting the code it also looks like they had similar implementations at one time and/or borrowed from each other.

If there was a common implementation bugs such as JAVASERVERFACES-3215 would probably not have been there.

It would also prevent issues like JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1103. In that case UIData got a new feature that UIRepeat would have needed just as well, but because of the time between JSF releases now has to wait for this for a rather long time.

Comment by Ed Burns [ 01/Aug/14 ]

Set priority to baseline ahead of JSF 2.3 triage. Priorities will be assigned accurately after this exercise.

Comment by Manfred Riem [ 01/Aug/14 ]

Setting priority to Major

Generated at Mon Feb 27 15:55:02 UTC 2017 using JIRA 6.2.3#6260-sha1:63ef1d6dac3f4f4d7db4c1effd405ba38ccdc558.