[JSR348-146] EC as level playing field Created: 21/Sep/11  Updated: 21/Sep/11  Resolved: 21/Sep/11

Status: Closed
Project: jsr348
Component/s: Process Doc
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: sean_sheedy Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Won't Fix Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified


Process Document review

line numbers: JCP-2.8-21SEP2011-Redlined.pdf

738 - no company should have a permanent seat on the JCP. JCP participation is not mandatory; if the JCP is not working for a company, they can exit the JCP. That, and an ability to fork Java, provide very strong incentives to members to work to keep JCP Java the best it can be, and highly competitive with respect to other platforms.

PC> No comment.

SS> Originally we had agreed to defer "controversial" topics like this to v2 of JCP.next (JSPA changes) but since this JSR contains many "controversial" changes I have to raise it.

Comment by pcurran [ 21/Sep/11 ]

As we've agreed, controversial, legal, and governance issues are out of scope for this JSR.

Generated at Sat Oct 22 05:54:16 UTC 2016 using JIRA 6.2.3#6260-sha1:63ef1d6dac3f4f4d7db4c1effd405ba38ccdc558.