[JSR348-95] Section 1.1.2 needs a little rewording to alleviate ambiguities Created: 23/Aug/11 Updated: 08/Sep/11 Resolved: 08/Sep/11
|Remaining Estimate:||Not Specified|
|Time Spent:||Not Specified|
|Original Estimate:||Not Specified|
In section 1.1.2 it's stated that a publicly readable issue tracker should be used for the specification but implies users can add comments (doesn't say anything about the public being able to add issues). With all the explicit defining that has gone into the current drafts, should this be clarified a bit more to allow addition of issues / comments by the public or simple remove the word "readable" and simply go with "Issues must be tracked through a public issue tracking mechanism."?
|Comment by pcurran [ 08/Sep/11 ]|
The new wording proposed for section 1.1.2 in
I'm closing this issue. Further comments can be added to