-1. We already talked about this and it is a bad idea that weakensI have a few concerns with this. First of all, JSPs are not evolving : it is a poor UI framework (no Ajax and so on) and is not a templating fwk either. Second, except if I'm missed something on Servlet 3.1, we don't have a simple controller to build MVC web apps. With just Servlets and JSPs, we miss the controller. I remember that the JAX-RS 1.1 and Servlet 3.0 expert group talked about it, but I think nothing happened.
compatibility (the whole point of the JCP/Java EE).
Feb 23, 2012 06:22:13 AM, jsr342-experts@... wrote:
I remember back on the Java EE 6 expert group we talked about having
a "minimal profile" with only Servlet& JSPs (I remember Rod Johnson
being interested in such profile, Roberto Chinicci even wrote a few
blog posts about it :
For me, such a minimal profile would make sense with a proper
templating framework, Expression Language and a simple servlet
controller (à la Spring MVC). My 2 cents Antonio
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:03, Jason Porter wrote: I'd also like to
suggest a simple Servlet or Basic profile. It would include servlets,
JSP, EL, CDI and JAX-RS. Essentially tomcat / jetty with CDI and
JAX-RS integrated. This would give a very powerful programming
environment (namely CDI and JAX-RS) as a strong base and also allow
our friends developing tomcat and jetty to join in and be a Java EE
compliant server! Oh, and JSF would then run purely in a Java EE
environment, no more "pseudo EE container" aka Servlet container.
[jsr342-experts] Re: Servlet Profile (was JAX-RS and the Web Profile)
|Jason T. Greene||02/23/2012|