[jsr342-experts] Re: CDI in Application Client Container
- From: Markus Eisele <myfear@...>
- To: jsr342-experts@...
- Subject: [jsr342-experts] Re: CDI in Application Client Container
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:46:10 +0100
+1 for "CDI should work in ACC"
On 7 December 2012 21:32, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.goncalves@...> wrote:
> One thing is "is ACC used in the industry ?" and I think we all agree that
> it's not. The other thing is "the spec says the CDI works in ACC". So either
> the TCK makes sure it does (and everybody implements it), or we prune it, or
> we say "CDI should work in ACC"
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Jim Knutson <knutson@...> wrote:
>> eisele.markus@... wrote on 11/20/2012 01:42:10 AM:
>> > short feedback: I haven't seen much ACC out there until today.
>> > Native clients are still somehow rare and most of the native java
>> > clients rely on decoupled interfaces (WS/REST).
>> > No need to put any efforts into the ACC if you ask me.
>> I don't see enough industry usage to warrant a lot of effort here. If
>> anything, we should be enabling "thin client" models that allows apps to
>> embed EE container and service functionality as needed.
>> Jim Knutson
>> WebSphere Java EE Architect
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
> Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France