[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: Implicit Producers
- From: Adam Bien <abien@...>
- To: jsr342-experts@...
- Subject: [javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: Implicit Producers
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 19:25:50 +0200
- List-id: <jsr342-experts.javaee-spec.java.net>
I referred in my earlier emails to them as default producers provided by the
spec. A default producer would expose default resources and make them
available via a simple @Inject.
Hence default producer is a producer, you could also @Specialize it...
On 11.04.2012, at 05:26, David Blevins wrote:
> Another concrete topic on aligning things (noticed this in some of the
> Many times it has come up that we want to make more things injectable via
> @Inject at the platform level. I'm totally on board with that and have
> been doing some of the suggesting.
> I've started mentally calling them "implicit" producers as effectively what
> we're doing is adding producers to applications that weren't explicitly
> created by the application.
> As a large number of applications in existence will already have producer
> methods or fields that produce various JavaEE resources currently only
> available via @Resource, @EJB, etc. there is a bit of a compatibility issue.
> Even if we add producers with full spec-standard qualifiers, any existing
> injection points that do not use qualifiers become ambiguous.
> It would be great to hear some thoughts on how to solve that.