Skip to main content

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

  • From: Markus Eisele <myfear@...>
  • To: jsr342-experts@...
  • Subject: [javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform
  • Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:02:31 +0200
  • List-id: <jsr342-experts.javaee-spec.java.net>

Hi Linda/all,


> JSR         full Platform       Web Profile
> ----        -------------       ----------
> JSON-P           [X]                [X]
> Web Socket       [X]                [X]
> Batch            [X]                [ ]

I am wondering what you know about 107. To me it seems as if they also
could make it.
My short talk to Greg in February left me with that impression.
Curious what he told you. (You are talking with him, right?)
Java Batch also did a lot of work recently and published first Draft
and RI iteration.
The tests run smoothly and there is nothing there that gives the
impression they could not make it.

350 obviously postponed to EE 8, right? I'm fine with that.

Thanks,
- Markus

On 11 September 2012 02:04, Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel@...> wrote:
>
> We have a number of new JSRs in flight that we expect to complete
> within the Java EE 7 time frame and that we believe are appropriate
> for inclusion in the Java EE Platform -- namely:
>   * Java API for JSON Processing 1.0 (JSR 353)
>   * Java API for Web Socket 1.0  (JSR 356)
>   * Batch Applications for the Java Platform 1.0 (JSR 352)
>
> JSON-P 1.0 and Web Socket 1.0 are also both logically candidates
> for inclusion in the Web Profile.
>
> Please let us know if you support adding these technologies to the
> full Java EE 7 Platform and Web Profile.
>
> JSR         full Platform       Web Profile
> ----        -------------       ----------
> JSON-P           [ ]                [ ]
> Web Socket       [ ]                [ ]
> Batch            [ ]                [ ]
>
>
> Note that we certainly would also like to include JCACHE (JSR 107),
> Concurrency Utilities for Java EE (JSR 236), and Java State Management
> (JSR 350), but at this time we are less certain about their readiness
> in the Java EE 7 timeframe.   Hopefully, however, we will be able to
> ask you about their inclusion in the coming months.
>
> thanks,
>
> -Linda


[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Markus Eisele 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Werner Keil 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Jim Knutson 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Werner Keil 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Pete Muir 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Werner Keil 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Antonio Goncalves 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Jim Knutson 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Werner Keil 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/17/2012
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close