Skip to main content

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

  • From: Werner Keil <werner.keil@...>
  • To: jsr342-experts@...
  • Subject: [javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform
  • Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:42:10 +0200
  • List-id: <jsr342-experts.javaee-spec.java.net>

+1

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir@...> wrote:
We would agree with your proposal:

JSR         full Platform       Web Profile
----        -------------       ----------
JSON-P           [X]                [X]
Web Socket       [X]                [X]
Batch            [X]                [ ]

We would also raise the issue of whether JAX-RS should be in the web profile again, as it's a natural match for it (more and more apps use the REST architecture for writing web apps), especially if JSON-P is there.


On 11 Sep 2012, at 01:04, Linda DeMichiel wrote:

>
> We have a number of new JSRs in flight that we expect to complete
> within the Java EE 7 time frame and that we believe are appropriate
> for inclusion in the Java EE Platform -- namely:
>  * Java API for JSON Processing 1.0 (JSR 353)
>  * Java API for Web Socket 1.0  (JSR 356)
>  * Batch Applications for the Java Platform 1.0 (JSR 352)
>
> JSON-P 1.0 and Web Socket 1.0 are also both logically candidates
> for inclusion in the Web Profile.
>
> Please let us know if you support adding these technologies to the
> full Java EE 7 Platform and Web Profile.
>
> JSR         full Platform       Web Profile
> ----        -------------       ----------
> JSON-P           [ ]                [ ]
> Web Socket       [ ]                [ ]
> Batch            [ ]                [ ]
>
>
> Note that we certainly would also like to include JCACHE (JSR 107),
> Concurrency Utilities for Java EE (JSR 236), and Java State Management
> (JSR 350), but at this time we are less certain about their readiness
> in the Java EE 7 timeframe.   Hopefully, however, we will be able to
> ask you about their inclusion in the coming months.
>
> thanks,
>
> -Linda





[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Markus Eisele 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Werner Keil 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Jim Knutson 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Werner Keil 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Pete Muir 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Werner Keil 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Antonio Goncalves 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Jim Knutson 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Werner Keil 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/17/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Jeff Genender 09/17/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/17/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Jeff Genender 09/17/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Antonio Goncalves 09/19/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/19/2012
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close