Skip to main content

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

  • From: Jeff Genender <jgenender@...>
  • To: jsr342-experts@...
  • Subject: [javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform
  • Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:34:42 -0600
  • List-id: <jsr342-experts.javaee-spec.java.net>

Linda,

I am fine for all 3, but the JSON and Websockets are more priority for me.  
Batch is of a lesser priority in my book.  But if it made it in, its 
certainly not a bad thing.

Jeff


On Sep 17, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Linda DeMichiel wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
> 
> Just to be sure -- all 3 in the Web Profile?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> -Linda
> 
> 
> On 9/17/2012 1:25 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>> I indeed support those in the profile.  I think they belong there at this 
>> stage.
>
>> Jeff
>
>> On Sep 17, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Linda DeMichiel wrote:
>
>>> I'd like to get input from the rest of you on this item.
>>> 
>>> Please???
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> 
>>> -Linda
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 9/10/2012 5:04 PM, Linda DeMichiel wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> We have a number of new JSRs in flight that we expect to complete
>>>> within the Java EE 7 time frame and that we believe are appropriate
>>>> for inclusion in the Java EE Platform -- namely:
>>>> * Java API for JSON Processing 1.0 (JSR 353)
>>>> * Java API for Web Socket 1.0 (JSR 356)
>>>> * Batch Applications for the Java Platform 1.0 (JSR 352)
>>>> 
>>>> JSON-P 1.0 and Web Socket 1.0 are also both logically candidates
>>>> for inclusion in the Web Profile.
>>>> 
>>>> Please let us know if you support adding these technologies to the
>>>> full Java EE 7 Platform and Web Profile.
>>>> 
>>>> JSR full Platform Web Profile
>>>> ---- ------------- ----------
>>>> JSON-P [ ] [ ]
>>>> Web Socket [ ] [ ]
>>>> Batch [ ] [ ]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Note that we certainly would also like to include JCACHE (JSR 107),
>>>> Concurrency Utilities for Java EE (JSR 236), and Java State Management
>>>> (JSR 350), but at this time we are less certain about their readiness
>>>> in the Java EE 7 timeframe. Hopefully, however, we will be able to
>>>> ask you about their inclusion in the coming months.
>>>> 
>>>> thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> -Linda
>



[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

(continued)

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Werner Keil 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Pete Muir 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Werner Keil 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/11/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Antonio Goncalves 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Jim Knutson 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Werner Keil 09/12/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/17/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Jeff Genender 09/17/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/17/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Jeff Genender 09/17/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Antonio Goncalves 09/19/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/19/2012

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

Linda DeMichiel 09/27/2012
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close