On 11/5/2012 4:41 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
Hi Linda,* EE.6.5 JavaServer Pages™ (JSP) *2.2* Requirements : Should be JSP *2.3*
Just a couple of spec version mistake I recon :
* EE.6.9 JavaMail™ *1.4* Requirements : Should be *1.5*
* EE.6.10 Java EE™ Connector Architecture *1.6* Requirements : Should be *1.7*
Yes, you are right. I should have noted that I haven't finished updating version numbers for MRs,
pending whether their changes would cause a version number update or not. I will fix this in
the Public Review Draft of the spec.Default producers are on the RFE list. We are still currently investigating this and tracking as an issue
BTW, EE.5.20 / 21 talks about default Data Source & JMS Factory. But what about the producers which will allow us to
just go @Inject DataSource. We talked about it in the ML but I don't see anyting in the spec.
AntonioProfile specifications to javaee-spec.java.net/downloads <http://javaee-spec.java.net/downloads>__. These
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel@... <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>> wrote:
I've just uploaded revised drafts of the Java EE Platform and WebWeb site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
drafts include the following additions as well as the changes to
reflect the Java EE 7 roadmap changes we announced earlier this month:
Java EE security manager requirements and permission declaration syntax
Requirements for the inclusion of support for WebSocket, JSON-P, and Batch
in the full Platform; and for WebSocket and JSON-P in the Web Profile.
The changebars show the changes since the Early Draft. If there is any
reason you think we should not submit these drafts to the JCP as an
Early Draft 2, please let me know.
Software architect and Java Champion
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr>
[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: Updated specification drafts for EDR2