Congrats to the EG :) Very good news!
> At this point, we expect that JSR-236 will meet our target dates for
> inclusion into Java EE 7. JSR-236 is an obvious candidate for inclusion
> in the full Java EE Platform, and we believe that it should be.
> Pleases let us know:
> (1) Whether you see any reason that JSR 236 should not be included in
> the full platform?
Very undecided myself.
> (2) Whether you think that JSR 236 should also be included in the Web
pro: No EJB Timer service in WP, so there might be a need for some
lightweight timer driven things which could be done with 236
con: WP is getting too big ...
As of today I would NOT include it in the WP.
[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236
|Yoon Kyung Koo||01/30/2013|