Skip to main content

[javaee-spec users] Re: [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236

  • From: Marina Vatkina <marina.vatkina@...>
  • To: users@...
  • Cc: Markus Eisele <myfear@...>
  • Subject: [javaee-spec users] Re: [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:35:04 -0800

On 1/24/13 11:30 PM, Markus Eisele wrote:
Hi,

At this point, we expect that JSR-236 will meet our target dates for
inclusion into Java EE 7.  JSR-236 is an obvious candidate for inclusion
in the full Java EE Platform, and we believe that it should be.
Congrats to the EG :) Very good news!

Pleases let us know:

(1) Whether you see any reason that JSR 236 should not be included in
the full platform?
No.

(2) Whether you think that JSR 236 should also be included in the Web
Profile?
Very undecided myself.
pro: No EJB Timer service in WP,

Non-persistent EJB Timers and local Async invocations are now (EJB 3.2) part of the EJB Lite and are available in WP.

-marina

  so there might be a need for some
lightweight timer driven things which could be done with 236

con: WP is getting too big ...

As of today I would NOT include it in the WP.

- M



[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] JSR 236

Linda DeMichiel 01/24/2013

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236

Markus Eisele 01/25/2013

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236

Werner Keil 01/25/2013

[javaee-spec users] Re: [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236

Marina Vatkina 01/25/2013

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236

Florent BENOIT 01/25/2013

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236

Deepak Anupalli 01/25/2013

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236

Werner Keil 01/25/2013

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236

Antonio Goncalves 01/25/2013

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236

Jim Knutson 01/29/2013

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236

Yoon Kyung Koo 01/30/2013

[javaee-spec users] [jsr342-experts] Re: JSR 236

Linda DeMichiel 01/31/2013
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close