Skip to main content

[javaee-spec users] Re: Wish-List for EE 8

  • From: Arun Gupta <arun.p.gupta@...>
  • To: users@...
  • Cc: Kevin Sutter <sutter@...>
  • Subject: [javaee-spec users] Re: Wish-List for EE 8
  • Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:55:24 -0700
  • Organization: Oracle


Got it and updated it!

But that is a discrepancy with other specs and I'll follow up with JSF spec lead on that.


On 8/14/13 8:40 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
Hi Arun,
The version tag for the javax.faces needs to be 2.2, not 2.2.0
Maven doesn't know about the 2.2.0 version, but it does know how to process the 2.2 version.

-- Kevin

From: Arun Gupta <arun.p.gupta@...>
To: users@...,
Cc: Kevin Sutter/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS
Date: 08/12/2013 09:04 PM
Subject: [javaee-spec users] Re: Wish-List for EE 8

Hi Kevin,

Fixed javax.servlet package.

I realized javax.faces is already 2.2.0 as shown in:

Is this version need to be updated some where else ?


On 8/8/13 6:39 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
Back to the thread discussing the Java EE 7 artifacts... The information on this page (_ needs a couple of updates...

The version for the javax.servlet package should be 3.1.0 (not 3.1).

The version for the javax.faces package should be 2.2 (not 2.2.0).

I don't have authority to update this Maven Coordinate page. Can somebody correct these two entries? Thank you.

-- Kevin Sutter

Bill Shannon _<bill.shannon@...>_ <mailto:bill.shannon@...>wrote on 07/19/2013 06:38:28 PM:

> From: Bill Shannon _<bill.shannon@...>_ <mailto:bill.shannon@...>
> To: _users@....net_ <mailto:users@...>,
> Date: 07/19/2013 06:39 PM
> Subject: [javaee-spec users] Re: Wish-List for EE 8
> arjan tijms wrote on 07/19/13 13:55:
> Hi,
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Arun Gupta _<arun.p.gupta@...>_ <mailto:arun.p.gupta@...>wrote:
> I updated the page at:
> _
> to describe all the Java EE 7 maven coordinates.
> That's a convenient overview! :) On that page it can be seen that
> the GA pattern is mostly:
> groupId = javax.[keyword]
> artifactId = javax.[keyword]-api
> JPA, CDI, Bean Validation and Batch use a different pattern. Batch
> is quite close, but for some reason has "-annotation" instead of "-
> api" in the artifactID. Bean Validation is also close, but doesn't
> have its artifactId starting with "javax" (why?)
> JPA and CDI have rather different names.
> We hope to fix JPA soon and publish a correctly named API jar file.
> CDI is in a tough position because, unlike almost all the other
> specs, there's no single Java package that corresponds to CDI.  What
> we came up with for CDI is a compromise.

> A few not listed also have rather different names, e.g. JASPIC:
> _
> groupId:
> artifactId: jaspic.provider.framework
> Some APIs don't follow the pattern because we didn't update the API
> for EE 7.  Some are just mistakes.  All things considered, there's a
> large amount of consistency there.  We even created a Maven plugin
> that checks an API jar file to ensure that it's following the rules.



[javaee-spec users] Re: Wish-List for EE 8

Kevin Sutter 08/08/2013

[javaee-spec users] Re: Wish-List for EE 8

Arun Gupta 08/13/2013

[javaee-spec users] Re: Wish-List for EE 8

Kevin Sutter 08/14/2013

[javaee-spec users] Re: Wish-List for EE 8

Arun Gupta 08/14/2013
Please Confirm