Skip to main content

[javaee-spec users] Position on SecurityManager/Policy SE APIs

  • From: Raymond Auge <raymond.auge@...>
  • To: users@...
  • Subject: [javaee-spec users] Position on SecurityManager/Policy SE APIs
  • Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:31:40 -0400

Hello everyone,

My name is Raymond Auge and this is my first email to the list. Hopefully I
follow proper protocol. Please let me know if I have not.

-----
Sorry, my question may seem odd.

I would like to get an official position statement on the handling of the
SecurityManager/Policy APIs with respect to Java EE?

I suppose I am asking:

"Is it OK for Java EE specifications/implementations to make assumptions
about the state of the SecurityManager/Policy without respecting changes in
their runtime state?"

-- 
*Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
 (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect
*Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay)


[javaee-spec users] Position on SecurityManager/Policy SE APIs

Raymond Auge 08/21/2013

[javaee-spec users] Re: Position on SecurityManager/Policy SE APIs

Ron Monzillo 08/21/2013

[javaee-spec users] Re: Position on SecurityManager/Policy SE APIs

Raymond Auge 08/22/2013

[javaee-spec users] Re: Position on SecurityManager/Policy SE APIs

Ron Monzillo 08/22/2013

[javaee-spec users] Re: Position on SecurityManager/Policy SE APIs

Raymond Auge 08/22/2013

[javaee-spec users] Re: Position on SecurityManager/Policy SE APIs

Ron Monzillo 08/22/2013

[javaee-spec users] Re: Position on SecurityManager/Policy SE APIs

Raymond Auge 08/22/2013

[javaee-spec users] Re: Position on SecurityManager/Policy SE APIs

Ron Monzillo 08/22/2013

[javaee-spec users] Re: Position on SecurityManager/Policy SE APIs

Raymond Auge 08/22/2013
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close