Skip to main content

[JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase

  • From: Werner Keil <werner.keil@...>
  • To: jcurrency_mail@...
  • Subject: [JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase
  • Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 02:23:14 +0100

Would be good to know Oracle/JDK's opinion on that particular term.
The effort I mentioned was incomplete and broke Build, so I helped Anatole revert it.
Thanks for the update.
For all I saw, ISO in names seems explicitely excempted, unless someone changed their mind on that, too?;-)

Am 03.02.2013 00:28 schrieb "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebourne@...>:


[JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase

Werner Keil 02/03/2013

[JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase

Bob Lee 02/03/2013

[JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase

Werner Keil 02/03/2013

[JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase

Anatole Tresch 02/03/2013

[JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase

Anatole Tresch 02/03/2013

[JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase

Sascha Freitag 02/03/2013

[JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase

Chris Pheby 02/05/2013

<Possible follow-up(s)>

[JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase

Werner Keil 02/03/2013

[JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase

Werner Keil 02/03/2013

[JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase

Sascha Freitag 02/03/2013

[JSR-354] Re: UPPERCASE vs. CamelCase

Werner Keil 02/03/2013
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close