Skip to main content

[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

  • From: Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne@...>
  • To: jcurrency_mail@...
  • Subject: [JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount
  • Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 15:32:44 +0100

On 14 July 2013 12:25, Anatole Tresch <atsticks@...> wrote:
> along the discussion on amounts, I would like to add an additional point,
> which may be interesting. Often, when we are working with amounts, or
> passing them around in our logic, an "amount is not an amount", meaning that
> it would be a big advantage, when we would be able to classify amounts using
> something like an amount type. Also when working with collections of amounts
> according functions (FunctionalInterface)  passed to such collections can
> also easily benefit from such a feature.

AmountType is not part of the intrinsic nature of the money value
type, and should not be modelled by this group.

Currency, Money and formatting. Thats all.

Stephen


[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

(continued)

[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

Chris Pheby 07/13/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

Werner Keil 07/13/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

tom.huesler@... 07/13/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

Werner Keil 07/14/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

Chris Pheby 07/14/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

Stephen Colebourne 07/14/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

Werner Keil 07/14/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

Werner Keil 07/14/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

Werner Keil 07/16/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

Anatole Tresch 07/14/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Mathematical Operations on MonetaryAmount

Stephen Colebourne 07/14/2013
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close