[JSR-354] Re: RI Package name
- From: Anatole Tresch <atsticks@...>
- To: "jcurrency_mail@..." <jcurrency_mail@...>
- Subject: [JSR-354] Re: RI Package name
- Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 20:20:47 +0200
For me the tck logically is more related to the spec than the ri. Do we
really prefer org.javamoney.tck in favor of javax.money.tck. ???
Basically i do not like extras as a name. I can imagine that we will extend
it to a full fledged financial framework in the future. If we call it
javamoney or org.javamoney is secondary for me. Moneta could then be just the
core module within javamoney.
Or we go the other way round. Use jodamoney as ri, and provide javamoney as
addition/extension to jodamoney....
So discussion is opened!
Tel +41 (43) 317 05 30
Send from Mobile
> Am 05.10.2013 um 16:48 schrieb Werner Keil <werner.keil@...>:
> Good point. org.javamoney is registered for the EG, so it might be best.
> If the prior Doodle with Moneta as preferable RI name also resulted in a
> java.net project, then "net.java.moneta" would also work.
> I am fine with either, but if RI and/or TCK used org.javamoney, then please
> let's clarify the project naming on GitHub.
> Calling the former "extra" "org.javamoney" seems a bit irritating. If you
> followed a strict Maven GroupID naming, then the Spec repository should be
> I somewhat followed the ThreeTen repository naming when creating "extras",
> so if any other parts like RI or TCK use the org.javamoney domain, it would
> be a good idea to either call it "extra" or "extras" again. Or put both RI
> and TCK under "org.javamoney" while leaving the "spec" in a seperate
> "javax.money" repository.
>> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne@...> wrote:
>> Remember that it needs to be a domain you own. Since you don't own
>> moneta.org you shouldn't use it.
>> I would warn that org.javamoney is complicated by "javamoney" being a
>> term against Oracle/JCP restrictions. However, since it is owned and
>> no-one has complained, that is probably the best option for a base.
>> Thus org.javamoney.moneta would be currently be the most appropriate
>> On 4 October 2013 22:31, Anatole Tresch <atsticks@...> wrote:
>> > Hi all
>> > we should rename our RI classes from javax.money to something better.
>> > we could use
>> > org.javamoney as a root package,
>> > or go fo the RI name from the ballot
>> > org.moneta, or
>> > org.gelt, or
>> > org.javamoney.moneta
>> > org.javamoney.gelt
>> > WDYT?
>> > Cheers,
>> > --
>> > Anatole Tresch
>> > Java Lead Engineer, JSR Spec Lead
>> > Glärnischweg 10
>> > CH - 8620 Wetzikon
>> > Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1
>> > Twitter: @atsticks
>> > Blogs: http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
>> > Google: atsticks
>> > Mobile +41-76 344 62 79