Skip to main content

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

  • From: Werner Keil <werner.keil@...>
  • To: "jcurrency_mail@..." <jcurrency_mail@...>
  • Subject: [JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!
  • Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:42:04 +0200

Yes they are, see JSR 310, where unless PMO changed its mind (based on
Oracle that after all controls both) the spec document for JSR 310 has been
delayed due to the later shipment date, hence a Renewal Ballot just like
this JSR already passed it could be necessary for the next EC after this
month.

There is at least one JEP until OpenJDK might call it differently (i.E. by
using JIRA to the full extent possible) in the future, that we'd also have
to file. Brian Goetz told me already in January where he whitnessed my
"sales pitch" for JSR 354 before the Renewal Ballot that you may file such
request any time regardless of the state of OpenJDK. It'll be pulled in if
accepted for the right version. 9 seems right for us, unless Oracle has
other plans or priorities.

Werner

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Stephen Colebourne
<scolebourne@...>wrote:

> Yes, assuming changes can still occur based on feedback and other
> input after the review.
>
> The primary goal of the next review phase is to get buy-in from Oracle
> for JDK9. I think that the spec document is reasonable for the new
> review at this point, I haven't had a chance to review the JSR API
> code.
>
> I would suggest that the key Oracle people will be busy finishing JDK8
> for the next month or so, thus there is advantage to a delay. However,
> the process of Oracle review can also be separate from the process of
> JCP tick-boxing.
>
> Stephen
>
>
>
>
> On 15 October 2013 22:28, Anatole Tresch <atsticks@...> wrote:
> > Hi everybody in EG
> >
> > so it seems that we can go for the Public Review now...?
> >
> > Everybody please answer with Yes, or No. If No, tell, what you think is
> > still missing or should be improved/changed.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Anatole
> >
> > --
> > Anatole Tresch
> > Java Lead Engineer, JSR Spec Lead
> > Gl√§rnischweg 10
> > CH - 8620 Wetzikon
> >
> > Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1
> > Twitter:  @atsticks
> > Blogs: http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
> > Google: atsticks
> > Mobile  +41-76 344 62 79
>


[JSR-354] Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Anatole Tresch 10/15/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Werner Keil 10/15/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Simon Martinelli 10/16/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Greg Bakos 10/16/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Jeff Prestes 10/16/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

tom.huesler@... 10/16/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Werner Keil 10/16/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Stephen Colebourne 10/16/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Werner Keil 10/16/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Tresch, Anatole (KGVA 28) 10/17/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Tony Jewell 10/16/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Werner Keil 10/16/2013

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Anatole Tresch 10/16/2013

Message not available

Message not available

Message not available

Message not available

Message not available

[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!

Werner Keil 10/18/2013
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close