[JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!
- From: "Tresch, Anatole (KGVA 28)" <anatole.tresch@...>
- To: "jcurrency_mail@..." <jcurrency_mail@...>
- Subject: [JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 08:41:42 +0000
- Accept-language: de-CH, en-US
See inline, some minor comments/agreements:
From: jodastephen@... [mailto:jodastephen@...] On Behalf Of Stephen Colebourne
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 12:33
Subject: [JSR-354] Re: Spec for Public Review: Ballot!
Yes, assuming changes can still occur based on feedback and other
input after the review.
-> Of course, that is part of the process ;-)
The primary goal of the next review phase is to get buy-in from Oracle
for JDK9. I think that the spec document is reasonable for the new
review at this point, I haven't had a chance to review the JSR API
-> I will also check it back once more, but as far as I know the API code
should look quite good, too.
I would suggest that the key Oracle people will be busy finishing JDK8
for the next month or so, thus there is advantage to a delay. However,
the process of Oracle review can also be separate from the process of
-> I think, we will have to check that back, e.g. with Roger Riggs. For sure
we have to ensure some kind of
Sign off for the next stages...
On 15 October 2013 22:28, Anatole Tresch <atsticks@...> wrote:
> Hi everybody in EG
> so it seems that we can go for the Public Review now...?
> Everybody please answer with Yes, or No. If No, tell, what you think is
> still missing or should be improved/changed.
> Anatole Tresch
> Java Lead Engineer, JSR Spec Lead
> Glärnischweg 10
> CH - 8620 Wetzikon
> Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1
> Twitter: @atsticks
> Blogs: http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
> Google: atsticks
> Mobile +41-76 344 62 79