[jsr344-experts mirror] [jsr344-experts] Re: [1169-NewXmlns] Mandatory compliance

  • From: Edward Burns <edward.burns@...>
  • To: JSF Experts <jsr344-experts@...>
  • Subject: [jsr344-experts mirror] [jsr344-experts] Re: [1169-NewXmlns] Mandatory compliance
  • Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:56:50 -0800
  • List-id: <jsr344-experts.javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net>

>>>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:00:59 +0100, Michael Müller 
>>>>> <michael.mueller@...> said:

MM> It is important for any web developer to keep existing interfaces - at 
MM> least for a while. To keep existing systems running.
MM> Will the old schema become deprecated one day (and maybe get removed 
MM> after a couple of years)?

MM> Will it be possible to mix both naming conventions. e.g.
MM> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
MM>        xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets";
MM>        xmlns:h="http://xmlns.jcp.org/jsf/html";
MM>        xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core";>
MM> Or, if the developer uses the new naming convention in one document, she 
MM> has to update all within the same file (no mixing) to force a smooth 
MM> migration?

Yes, it will be possible to mix. 

Ed


[jsr344-experts mirror] [jsr344-experts] [1169-NewXmlns] Mandatory compliance

Edward Burns 02/27/2013

[jsr344-experts mirror] [jsr344-experts] Re: [1169-NewXmlns] Mandatory compliance

Michael Müller 02/27/2013

[jsr344-experts mirror] [jsr344-experts] Re: [1169-NewXmlns] Mandatory compliance

Edward Burns 02/28/2013
Terms of Use; Privacy Policy; Copyright ©2013-2014 (revision 20131025.e7cbc9d)
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close