I guess the issue id really about getting newer Java API available in Java SE 7+ explicitly used in JSR 339 API.
On Oct 30, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Sergey Beryozkin<sberyozkin@...> wrote:
On 29/10/12 19:06, Markus KARG wrote:
I think it is a very good idea to support lambda expressions, as it
makes the readability of anonymous callbacks much simple to read (and
write). On the other hand, AFAIK lambdas will enforce JRE 8, while our
API must be able to run on JRE 7.
Actually, it runs on JRE6.
Yes (because you insisted) :) Btw. do you still insist? Note that Java EE 7
requires Java SE 7. (Sorry for side-tracking the discussion here - just
thought it's good time to check again...)
How can this gap be bridged?
It is about making it ready, it does not have to bridged now
*From:*Marek Potociar [mailto:marek.potociar@...]
*Sent:* Montag, 29. Oktober 2012 12:07
*Subject:* [jsr339-experts] A proposal to make the JAX-RS API "lambda
A month ago at JavaOne, making APIs ready for closure support that is
coming in Java SE 8, was one of the hot topics. The main idea behind
making an API ready for "lambdas" (or closures), is to expose
single-method interfaces whenever one expects a future use of lambdas.
In JAX-RS 2.0, such places include definition of async response
callbacks as well as client-side invocation callback.
With that I took a stab on it and tried to come up with a proposal that
would make our new APIs more lambda-ready. Please review the proposal here:
In summary, I have updated the client.InvocationCallback to have only a
single method and since I anticipate that many users would still prefer
the old 2-method style, I'm adding an AbstractInvocationCallback
convenience class. On the side of async response container callbacks,
I've similarly updated the CompletionCallback and ResumeCallback APIs to
adopt a single-method pattern. In my last commit I've also decided
(based on numerous Sergey's requests) to propose removal of
ResumeCallback (for now).
I'm looking forward to your review comments.
Talend Community Coders
[jsr339-experts] Re: A proposal to make the JAX-RS API "lambda ready".