Skip to main content

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

  • From: Marek Potociar <marek.potociar@...>
  • To: jsr339-experts@...
  • Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException
  • Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 17:56:41 +0100


On Nov 5, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@...> wrote:

> On 05/11/12 16:42, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>> On 05/11/12 16:39, Marek Potociar wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Nov 5, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Sergey Beryozkin<sberyozkin@...>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 05/11/12 12:34, Marek Potociar wrote:
>>>>> Btw. other than ranting,
>>>> 
>>>> Will you just stop making conclusions like that ?
>>> 
>>> I'm sorry if the above offended you. I didn't mean it as offensive
>>> remark - just wanted to say, that you only expressed that you did not
>>> like it, but you did not support that by any technical argument. At
>>> least that was my feeling. I don't consider "ranting" as necessarily
>>> negative. Perhaps it's just a language issue - I'm not a native
>>> speaker myself.
>>> 
>>>> I've been thinking before sending the email of what I'm going to say,
>>>> as opposed to blindly expressing my disagreement. At least I'm not
>>>> changing my opinion from +0/+1 to -1 to +1.
>>> 
>>> If you indicate I'm changing my opinion, like that, it's IMO you who's
>>> being mean on purpose here, even though you are right.
>
>> It was a bad style, I'm sorry.
>
>> Cheers, Sergey
>
>>> While I certainly don't switch sides blindly without thinking (which
>>> is what you seem to indicate)
> 
> This is some more noise from me - but I was not referring to you with this 
> last piece. I spent some time with trying to come with some more arguments 
> against the refactoring - I postponed replying to it yesterday as needed 
> more time and I was saying exactly that, I was not just typing blindly 
> away, in response to the "rant" one
> 
> Anyway, sorry again and I'm off this thread

Now I feel bad. I did not want to discourage you from sharing your thoughts 
on this thread. I just wanted to say that you did not give me a valid reason 
why you think we should not to make that change. Please, if you feel like we 
should discuss this further and investigate more options, feel free to voice 
your opinions.

Marek

> 
> Sergey
> 
>> yet I do not have a problem to
>>> acknowledge I was wrong when facing sound arguments. There's nothing
>>> wrong with that IMO.
>>> 
>>> Marek
>>> 
>>>> Please hack the hierarchy whichever way you want
>>>> 
>>>> Sergey
>>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sergey Beryozkin
> 
> Talend Community Coders
> http://coders.talend.com/
> 
> Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com



[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

(continued)

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/02/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Marek Potociar 11/02/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/04/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Marek Potociar 11/04/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Marek Potociar 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Marek Potociar 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Marek Potociar 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Bill Burke 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Marek Potociar 11/07/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Bill Burke 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Markus KARG 11/02/2012
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close