[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException
- From: Marek Potociar <marek.potociar@...>
- To: jsr339-experts@...
- Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 17:56:41 +0100
On Nov 5, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@...> wrote:
> On 05/11/12 16:42, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>> On 05/11/12 16:39, Marek Potociar wrote:
>>> On Nov 5, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Sergey Beryozkin<sberyozkin@...>
>>>> On 05/11/12 12:34, Marek Potociar wrote:
>>>>> Btw. other than ranting,
>>>> Will you just stop making conclusions like that ?
>>> I'm sorry if the above offended you. I didn't mean it as offensive
>>> remark - just wanted to say, that you only expressed that you did not
>>> like it, but you did not support that by any technical argument. At
>>> least that was my feeling. I don't consider "ranting" as necessarily
>>> negative. Perhaps it's just a language issue - I'm not a native
>>> speaker myself.
>>>> I've been thinking before sending the email of what I'm going to say,
>>>> as opposed to blindly expressing my disagreement. At least I'm not
>>>> changing my opinion from +0/+1 to -1 to +1.
>>> If you indicate I'm changing my opinion, like that, it's IMO you who's
>>> being mean on purpose here, even though you are right.
>> It was a bad style, I'm sorry.
>> Cheers, Sergey
>>> While I certainly don't switch sides blindly without thinking (which
>>> is what you seem to indicate)
> This is some more noise from me - but I was not referring to you with this
> last piece. I spent some time with trying to come with some more arguments
> against the refactoring - I postponed replying to it yesterday as needed
> more time and I was saying exactly that, I was not just typing blindly
> away, in response to the "rant" one
> Anyway, sorry again and I'm off this thread
Now I feel bad. I did not want to discourage you from sharing your thoughts
on this thread. I just wanted to say that you did not give me a valid reason
why you think we should not to make that change. Please, if you feel like we
should discuss this further and investigate more options, feel free to voice
>> yet I do not have a problem to
>>> acknowledge I was wrong when facing sound arguments. There's nothing
>>> wrong with that IMO.
>>>> Please hack the hierarchy whichever way you want
> Sergey Beryozkin
> Talend Community Coders
> Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com