Skip to main content

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

  • From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@...>
  • To: <jsr339-experts@...>
  • Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException
  • Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 17:04:16 +0000

On 05/11/12 16:56, Marek Potociar wrote:

On Nov 5, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Sergey Beryozkin<sberyozkin@...>  wrote:

On 05/11/12 16:42, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
On 05/11/12 16:39, Marek Potociar wrote:

On Nov 5, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Sergey Beryozkin<sberyozkin@...>
wrote:

On 05/11/12 12:34, Marek Potociar wrote:
Btw. other than ranting,

Will you just stop making conclusions like that ?

I'm sorry if the above offended you. I didn't mean it as offensive
remark - just wanted to say, that you only expressed that you did not
like it, but you did not support that by any technical argument. At
least that was my feeling. I don't consider "ranting" as necessarily
negative. Perhaps it's just a language issue - I'm not a native
speaker myself.

I've been thinking before sending the email of what I'm going to say,
as opposed to blindly expressing my disagreement. At least I'm not
changing my opinion from +0/+1 to -1 to +1.

If you indicate I'm changing my opinion, like that, it's IMO you who's
being mean on purpose here, even though you are right.

It was a bad style, I'm sorry.

Cheers, Sergey

While I certainly don't switch sides blindly without thinking (which
is what you seem to indicate)

This is some more noise from me - but I was not referring to you with this last piece. 
I spent some time with trying to come with some more arguments against the refactoring 
- I postponed replying to it yesterday as needed more time and I was saying exactly 
that, I was not just typing blindly away, in response to the "rant" one

Anyway, sorry again and I'm off this thread

Now I feel bad. I did not want to discourage you from sharing your thoughts 
on this thread. I just wanted to say that you did not give me a valid reason 
why you think we should not to make that change. Please, if you feel like we 
should discuss this further and investigate more options, feel free to voice 
your opinions.


No problems at all :-). I guess in every process there will be someone who gets upset if things do not go his/her way, but the process needs to evolve either way :-), which I what I support. I'll chime in when I see a git link to the actual update :-)

Cheers, Sergey


Marek


Sergey

yet I do not have a problem to
acknowledge I was wrong when facing sound arguments. There's nothing
wrong with that IMO.

Marek

Please hack the hierarchy whichever way you want

Sergey



--
Sergey Beryozkin

Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/

Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com





[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

(continued)

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Marek Potociar 11/02/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/04/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Marek Potociar 11/04/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Marek Potociar 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Marek Potociar 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Marek Potociar 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Sergey Beryozkin 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Bill Burke 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Marek Potociar 11/07/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Bill Burke 11/05/2012

[jsr339-experts] Re: Ad JAX_RS_SPEC-257: Unification of MessageProcessingException and ClientException

Markus KARG 11/02/2012
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close