Skip to main content

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7

  • From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@...>
  • To: <jsr339-experts@...>
  • Subject: [jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7
  • Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:29:03 +0000

On 01/02/13 16:42, Marek Potociar wrote:
I see what you mean. Feel free to file a Jira issue so that we can
consider it in 2.1 timeframe.
Sounds good, will do.

By the way, AFAIK, MBW can also throw the exception, and the process is similar, if the exception is mapped then feed Response to MBW again and if MBW throws it again - propagate to the container.

I'm assuming that the filters throwing exceptions and then processing mapped responses does not affect the related MBW process, so effectively we can have the exceptions thrown and mapped twice on the server response chain, once by filters, next by MBW.

Or, actually, 3 times ?

Filters, then possibly WriterInterceptor and finally - MBW ?

Thanks, Sergey


Thank you,
Marek

On Feb 1, 2013, at 5:24 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@...
<mailto:sberyozkin@...>> wrote:

Yes, I agree it makes sense in most cases to support it.
I think there could be some issues though like double logging or
similar, etc, when the response filter which throws the exception has
been prioritized to be after such filters like logging one, etc.
The user might see for example from the in & out loggers:

Request: a
Response: aResponse
Response: aResponse2 or even aResponse

May be it is negligible this issue. Perhaps it can make sense to
consider adding an annotation like @NonReentrant or similar either for
2.0 or 2.1 if the group agrees it can be warranted. I'm easy either way

Cheers. Sergey





[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7

Marek Potociar 02/01/2013

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7

Sergey Beryozkin 02/01/2013

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7

Marek Potociar 02/01/2013

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7

Sergey Beryozkin 02/01/2013

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7

Marek Potociar 02/01/2013

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7

Sergey Beryozkin 02/01/2013

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7

Marek Potociar 02/01/2013

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7

Sergey Beryozkin 02/04/2013

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7

Marek Potociar 02/04/2013

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7

Sergey Beryozkin 02/04/2013

[jsr339-experts] Re: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: Re: Re: Need clarification on Section 6.7

Santiago Pericas-Geertsen 02/01/2013
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close