On 03.02.2013, at 19:07, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@...> wrote:
Jan - I keep suffering from not reading the messages carefully - you are
referring to the acceptance within your own project, which I guess is a good
indication of the usefulness of this media type - sorry;
Hey, no problem. You are right anyhow.
I'm with Marek though and I saw you had agreed to his proposal; I'd also
suggest to do the same for WADL media type - whatever people say we are
seeing WADL being useful to users, I'm sure the same is the case in RI...
Well, yes. I am against WADL as a design time contract, but it is a great
'tool' for server-side stuff, e.g. generating test. It could also be a
*runtime* form language (which would be RESTful) ... so I am not against the
media type :-)
[jsr339-experts] Re: application/json-home