[jax-rs-spec users] Re: [jsr339-experts] JAX-RS 2.1 JSR
- From: arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@...>
- To: "users@..." <users@...>
- Subject: [jax-rs-spec users] Re: [jsr339-experts] JAX-RS 2.1 JSR
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 23:02:49 +0200
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@...> wrote:
> Java 8 would be too early, same way as Java 7 was to early was Java 2.0.
> We have users still on Java 1.5 due to the internal restrictions.
If there are internal restrictions that prevent upgrading beyond Java 1.5
(or 1.7 for that matter), then why wouldn't there be similar restrictions
for upgrading JAX-RS?
In other words, wouldn't people stuck on an older JDK not also be stuck on
an older JAX-RS?
> Making Java 7 a base stack for 2.1 would work IMHO.
> Cheers, Sergey
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Santiago Pericas-Geertsen [mailto:
>> Sent: Dienstag, 19. August 2014 16:30
>> To: jsr339-experts@...
>> Subject: [jsr339-experts] JAX-RS 2.1 JSR
>> Hello Experts,
>> After collecting the feedback on this alias as well as that of the
>> community (via the survey), we are ready to move forward with JAX-RS
>> 2.1. We decided to spin off the MVC work into a separate JSR, now called
>> 1.0. It is likely that MVC 1.0 will define integration points with JAX-RS,
>> but it will be up to the MVC EG group to define those. In addition, MVC
>> may support other types of controllers.
>> In preparation for the JSR submission, I'd like to ask if I can list
>> name as a _supporter_ for JAX-RS 2.1 (Note that becoming a supporter is
>> different from an EG member). If you want to be listed as a supporter,
>> please respond to this message as soon as possible.
>> Looking forward to working with you again. Thanks!
>> -- Santiago