[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects
- From: Rüdiger zu Dohna <ruediger.dohna@...>
- To: "jsr343-experts@..." <jsr343-experts@...>
- Subject: [jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-70) Define annotations for injecting MessagingContext objects
- Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 22:10:01 +0200
- List-id: <jsr343-experts.jms-spec.java.net>
If I understand it correctly, the scope can't simple be dependent, because
then the connection/session would not be closed after use. So it's not about
extending the lifetime but about limiting it! The actual instance injected
(Nigel calls this a proxy, as it just forwards most calls) will be dependent
scoped, but the underlying connection/session must be transaction scoped.
Maybe we could find a better wording to explain this?
On 2012-06-01, at 21:05, Reza Rahman wrote:
> I do think we should reconsider separate JMSContext instance for every
> injection point. It's likely overkill with the updated definition of the
> transaction scope and would otherwise simplify matters from a JMSContext
> implementation standpoint.