Skip to main content

Users' Mailing List

Jan 62 Feb 66 Mar 101 Apr 77 May 36 Jun 24 Jul 27 Aug 14 Sep 20 Oct 47 Nov 31 Dec 18
Showing Page 1 of 1
Subject Author Date

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server

Rüdiger zu Dohna 07/03/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server

Nigel Deakin 07/09/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server

Rüdiger zu Dohna 07/10/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Proposals for MDB and RA standardisation (JMS_SPEC-30,55,54,25,73)

Reza Rahman 07/06/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Proposals for MDB and RA standardisation (JMS_SPEC-30,55,54,25,73)

Rüdiger zu Dohna 07/10/2012

<Possible follow-up(s)>

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Proposals for MDB and RA standardisation (JMS_SPEC-30,55,54,25,73)

Nigel Deakin 07/24/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage

Nick Wright 07/06/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: JMS 2.0: Planning the next stage

Nigel Deakin 07/09/2012

[jms-spec users] What is the expected value returned by setClientID when client identifier is unset?

Chris Barrow 07/06/2012

[jms-spec users] Re: What is the expected value returned by setClientID when client identifier is unset?

Nigel Deakin 07/09/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Welcome Pravesh Pandya

Nigel Deakin 07/09/2012

[jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0: enhancement request: more flexible acknowledgment modes

Nigel Deakin 07/09/2012

[jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0: enhancement request: more flexible acknowledgment modes

Chris Barrow 07/10/2012

[jms-spec users] Re: JMS Topics and historical data

Nigel Deakin 07/09/2012

[jms-spec users] Re: JMS Topics and historical data

Clebert Suconic 07/09/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay

Nigel Deakin 07/10/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay

Rüdiger zu Dohna 07/11/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay

Nigel Deakin 07/11/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay

Nick Wright 07/13/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay

Nigel Deakin 07/16/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay

Nick Wright 07/13/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay

Nigel Deakin 07/16/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-44) New API to specify delivery delay

Rüdiger zu Dohna 07/17/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server

Nigel Deakin 07/12/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server

Rüdiger zu Dohna 07/13/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server

Nigel Deakin 07/13/2012

[jms-spec users] [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-43) New API to send a message with async acknowledgement from server

Nigel Deakin 07/18/2012
Showing Page 1 of 1
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close