Skip to main content

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

  • From: Oliver Gierke <ogierke@...>
  • To: "jsr338-experts@..." <jsr338-experts@...>
  • Subject: [jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces
  • Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:58:39 -0700
  • Accept-language: de-DE, en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US


Am 12.03.2012 um 15:40 schrieb michael keith:

>> Could you elaborate on that? I don't quite get why this feature should 
>> stop companies from using JPA.
> No, I didn't say that very well. I meant the opposite, i.e. if the fact
> that there was no aliasing could prompt them to decide that...

Gotcha.

>> The latter doesn't seem to complicate things, does it? At least given the 
>> assumption there has to be a single implementation class to be selected to 
>> back the type alias, right?
> Every feature addition adds some non-zero amount of complexity. Our task
> is to weigh the value and usefulness of the feature with its complexity,
> with the time that we have to release the spec, and with its relative
> priority w.r.t. other potential features that may be more useful and
> more worth our time to add.

+1 on that. The question I wanted to raise if there's a significant 
difference in complexity by allowing multiple aliases over just one.

Cheers,
Ollie

-- 
/**
 * @author Oliver Gierke - Senior Member Technical Staff
 *
 * @param email ogierke@...
 * @param phone +49-351-30929001
 * @param fax   +49-351-418898439
 * @param skype einsdreizehn
 * @see http://www.olivergierke.de
 */

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail



[jsr338-experts] proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Steve Ebersole 03/09/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Oliver Gierke 03/09/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Steve Ebersole 03/09/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Bernd Müller 03/11/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

michael keith 03/11/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Matthew Adams 03/12/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

michael keith 03/12/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Oliver Gierke 03/12/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Werner Keil 03/12/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

michael keith 03/12/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Oliver Gierke 03/12/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Steve Ebersole 03/12/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Steve Ebersole 03/12/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

michael keith 03/14/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Steve Ebersole 03/14/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

michael keith 03/14/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Steve Ebersole 03/14/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Oliver Gierke 03/14/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Pinaki Poddar 03/12/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Oliver Gierke 03/12/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: proposal : @Entity on interfaces

Steve Ebersole 03/13/2012
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close