Skip to main content

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

  • From: Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel@...>
  • To: Steve Ebersole <steve.ebersole@...>, jsr338-experts@...
  • Subject: [jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy
  • Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:52:30 -0700
  • Organization: Oracle Corporation



On 4/10/2012 9:48 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
Will we at least have a standardized annotation for mapping the
"tenant identifier" column?

Certainly when we standardize on this approach. I'm not seeing why it
is essential
in purely application-managed SaaS however. Is it? If so, why?

In this SHARED_TABLE approach the table *will* have a column that identifies 
to which tenant a particular row's data
belongs. This column has to be named. How else where you propsing that the 
JPA provider be made aware of this column name?


In the expected case, the JPA provider knows that it is managing a shared 
table approach, so it
can generate the column.

Obviously if JPA 2.1 is not going to be supporting this SHARED_TABLE approach at all, 
this is "not needed". I am just
assuming that other providers will be supporting this as well (Hibernate 
will) and it seems to me that standardizing
this annotation up front saves end-user migration later.


[jsr338-experts] Re: [jpa-spec users] Re: support for multitenancy

(continued)

[jsr338-experts] Re: [jpa-spec users] Re: support for multitenancy

Steve Ebersole 04/04/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Gordon Yorke 04/18/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Gordon Yorke 04/18/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Linda DeMichiel 04/02/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Deepak Anupalli 04/03/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Pinaki Poddar 04/04/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

michael keith 04/04/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Steve Ebersole 04/10/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Linda DeMichiel 04/10/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Steve Ebersole 04/10/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Linda DeMichiel 04/10/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Steve Ebersole 04/10/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Steve Ebersole 04/10/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Linda DeMichiel 04/10/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Steve Ebersole 04/10/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

michael keith 04/10/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Linda DeMichiel 04/10/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

Steve Ebersole 04/11/2012

[jsr338-experts] Re: support for multitenancy

michael keith 04/11/2012
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close