Skip to main content

[json-processing-spec users] Re: JsonFeature interface - is it meant as a marker or constant?

  • From: < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [json-processing-spec users] Re: JsonFeature interface - is it meant as a marker or constant?
  • Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 01:28:14 +0000 (GMT)

i think JsonFeature is not required, we should change
JsonConfiguration's design, such as:

public class JsonConfiguration {
    public Object get(String name)
    public Object put(String name, Object value)
}


[json-processing-spec users] Re: JsonFeature interface - is it meant as a marker or constant?

szujobs 10/29/2012

[json-processing-spec users] Re: JsonFeature interface - is it meant as a marker or constant?

Tatu Saloranta 10/29/2012

[json-processing-spec users] Re: JsonFeature interface - is it meant as a marker or constant?

wenshao 10/29/2012

[json-processing-spec users] Re: JsonFeature interface - is it meant as a marker or constant?

Tatu Saloranta 10/29/2012

[json-processing-spec users] Re: JsonFeature interface - is it meant as a marker or constant?

Jitendra Kotamraju 10/29/2012

[json-processing-spec users] Re: JsonFeature interface - is it meant as a marker or constant?

Jörn Horstmann 10/29/2012

[json-processing-spec users] Re: JsonFeature interface - is it meant as a marker or constant?

Jitendra Kotamraju 10/29/2012
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close