On 3 May 2012, at 23:47, Weir, John wrote:
We have no objections. Should proceed to public review ___________________________________________ 30 Hudson Street | Jersey City, NJ 07302-4699 Managing Director, CTO Sachs ___________________________________________ The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. All rights reserved. See http://www.gs.com/disclaimer/global_email for important risk disclosures, conflicts of interest and other terms and conditions relating to this e-mail and your reliance on information contained in it. This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us immediately and delete this message. See http://www.gs.com/disclaimer/email for further information on confidentiality and the risks of non-secure electronic communication. If you cannot access these links, please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. From: Patrick Curran [mailto:
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 6:35 PM
To: JSR 355 Expert Group
Subject: [JSR355 EG] Time to go to Public Draft for JSR 355?
Our Early Draft Review finished at the end of April. During the review period we received only three minor comments (thanks, Victor!): one typo which I fixed, and two requests for clarification of Process Document definitions, neither of which is actually related to the proposed changes for JSR 355 but which we should address anyway before we finalize.
I see no reason not to move directly to Public Review. Does anyone disagree?
JBoss, by Red Hat
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Matt Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland).