There seems to be a wide-spread typo, as "Contributer" should be
"Contributor" like Distributor.
The discussion of OpenDocument or Word format vs. plain text documents
like MarkDown, AsciiDoc, etc. was held in a couple of JSRs of all stages.
Several Spec Leads prefer a text processor for WYSIWYG editing comfort.
And while e.g. our DevOps team in Denmark or Open Source projects mainly
around CDI made perfect progress using such markup styles, I haven't
seen a real equivalent to Drag & Drop graphic editing or quick preview
before you actually generate the PDF or other target document.
Where possible, I suggest we may share some of that in a Spec Lead Guide
or similar experience report. It isn't the first EG coming across such
questions and it won't be the last.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Anish Karmarkar
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 9:44 PM
Subject: [JSR358 EG] Re: First attempt at creating a IPR goals doc
Updated doc based on Patrick's suggestions. Doc is change-marked.
On 12/21/2012 12:30 PM, Anish Karmarkar wrote:
This includes material from Steve's presentation and subsequent
I can explain and go through the document on the call if Patrick wishes.
Note that this is just the 1st draft (of many to come, I suspect). I
tried to capture the proposal and my sense of where the IP Working Group
was heading. Patrick has already made three suggestions for the doc:
1) For completeness sake include every role/obligation/rights even if
says 'same as above',
2) Include a summary table (no more than a page).
3) If it makes sense add flow diagrams.
[JSR 358 Observer] [JSR358 EG] Re: First attempt at creating a IPR goals doc