Skip to main content

[jsr361-experts] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

  • From: Volker Bauche < >
  • To:
  • Subject: [jsr361-experts] Re: Version numbering for MEEP
  • Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 11:24:05 +0200

Hi Thomas,

excellent question. I have asked this too, but wrt CLDC we does not have a chance to
initiate a chance as CLDC is intended to have version numbers in sync with SE wrt
convergence ...
So it will be MEEP-8.0.0 on top of CLDC-1.8.0 which is not optimal but acceptable from my pov.

BR-
Volker

Am 05.08.2013 11:15, schrieb Lampart Thomas:
Hi Volker, experts,

Looks much better to me.
Only one question: What will be the version numbers for the related CLDC ?
Will it be "CLDC 8" and "CLDC-8.0.0" then ? Which would be good.
Or will it still be "CLDC-1.8.0" ?

Kind regards
   Thomas



-----Original Message-----
From: 

 
[mailto: ]
Sent: Montag, 5. August 2013 11:11
To: 

Subject: [jsr361-experts] Version numbering for MEEP

Dear experts,

coming back to my action item about need to improve the something confusing 
version numbering for MEEP in the current draft of the spec, I have discussed 
this with ME8 archtects and reflected our discussion during the call last 
week.
The outcome proposal is to have the following, much more consistent version 
numbers now:

Platform-level name: "MEEP 8"
Spec: "MEEP-8"
Profile version: "MEEP-8.0.0"
microedition.profile value: "MEEP-8.0"

I think this is the variant matching our ideas raised during the call
best:: everything is "8", no confusion between "8" and "1.x".

Pls. let me know if you like this solution, then I can fix this in the next 
(and PR) draft version.

Thanks -
Volker



[jsr361-experts] Version numbering for MEEP

volker.bauche 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Version numbering for MEEP

Werner Keil 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Lampart Thomas 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Volker Bauche 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Lampart Thomas 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Werner Keil 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Volker Bauche 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Werner Keil 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Werner Keil 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Volker Bauche 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Werner Keil 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Volker Bauche 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Werner Keil 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Michael Lagally 08/05/2013
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close