Skip to main content

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

  • From: Werner Keil < >
  • To:
  • Cc:
  • Subject: [jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP
  • Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:39:01 +0200

Well also CC the 360 EG now (though as mentioned, about 90% or more of the
members overlap[?])

It differs from new classes in Java SE where there's also an "Umbrella" JSR
that says Java 8 so theoretically the JavaDoc of new Java 8 classes could
as well say "since SE 8" or similar, but they say "since 1.8".

If ME wants to explicitly move in a new direction here, why not, just
saying it is inconsistent with SE in particular.

Werner

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Volker Bauche 
< >wrote:

>  Hi Werner,
>
> this is a discussion that has to be raised in the JSR-360 EG :-)
> But it depends of the context. If you refer to the @since clauses in
> Javadoc, I think "CLDC 8" is ok as it is the spec version.
>
> -Volker
>
> Am 05.08.2013 11:28, schrieb Werner Keil:
>
> Then we (or rather Spec Leads/EG of JSR 360) must fix all JavaDoc notes
> before CLDC goes final, if the version number is 1.8.0[?]
>
>  See a class introduced only with Java 5 like Enum: 1.5, CLDC 8
>
>  The Java version even up to 7 or 8 has always been 1.x, so if it's the
> same for CLDC it should say CLDC 1.8 not CLDC 8, right?
>
>  Werner
>
>
>

Attachment: 320.gif
Description: GIF image

Attachment: 347.gif
Description: GIF image



[jsr361-experts] Version numbering for MEEP

volker.bauche 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Version numbering for MEEP

Werner Keil 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Lampart Thomas 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Volker Bauche 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Lampart Thomas 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Werner Keil 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Volker Bauche 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Werner Keil 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Werner Keil 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Volker Bauche 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Werner Keil 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Volker Bauche 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Werner Keil 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Michael Lagally 08/05/2013

[jsr361-experts] Re: [jsr361-observers] Re: Re: Re: Re: Version numbering for MEEP

Michael Lagally 08/06/2013
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close