[jsr362-experts:] Re: New apidocs
- From: Martin Scott Nicklous <
- Subject: [jsr362-experts:] Re: New apidocs
- Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 06:39:36 +0200
I don't mean the license, I was talking about the copyright statement
(File: NOTICE). It currently reads as follows:
Java Portlet Specification V2.0
Copyright 2004-2009 Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/
© Copyright IBM Corp. 2006, 2007
All rights reserved.
As a minimum, we would probably want to change V2.0 to V3.0 and add the
year 2013 somewhere. I don't think that should really be too big of a deal.
David S Taylor
wrote on 03.08.2013 03:22:17:
> From: David S Taylor
> Date: 03.08.13 03:22
> Subject: [jsr362-experts:] Re: New apidocs
> Apache is pretty strict about their license. I've never seen a dual
> license in an Apache repository. What exactly do you want to do? I
> can bring it up on the legal discussion group at Apache...
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Martin Scott Nicklous <
> I put a new master branch and also the corresponding apidocs update up on
> the github portletspec3 repo containing the updates for PORTLETSPEC3-9. I
> incorporated Neil's suggestion to always use "returned URL" rather than
> sometimes "new URL" and other times "returned URL". We can talk about
> next week. If additional changes need to be made, naturally we'll make
> I also added references to the copyright & license as per Werner's
> suggestion. The copyright text is identical to the current copyright for
> the JSR 286 APIs on Apache for now. That text is likely not final - I'm
> contact with IBM legal to determine exactly what should be in there.
> David - the copyright text is an Apache copyright that refers to the
> original IBM copyright. It might be good if you could contact the Apache
> legal folks to get their point of view on the required new copyright
> contents for version 3.