[jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml
- From: Werner Keil <
- Subject: [jsr362-experts:] Re: pom.xml
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 18:47:07 +0200
Most importantly, shouldn't the POM be consistent with Portlet 1.0 and 2.0
<name>Portlet 3.0 API</name>
If we started with 0.1-SNAPSHOT, that sounded fair, eventually there should
be a 3,0 in the version number and I'd expect the javax.portlet group and
portlet-api artifactId must remain as they were.
org.apache.portals could be group of a <parent> POM if such exists, but not
replace javax.portlet I'd say.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Werner Keil
> If we depend on everything that's in there, I'd say so, but as mentioned,
> a few of the ingredients themselves do NOT require EE 7 or SE 7 as a
> minimum dependency, hence they also deviate while the "entire system"