[jsr362-experts:] Re: New apidocs
- From: David S Taylor <
- Subject: [jsr362-experts:] Re: New apidocs
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 18:22:17 -0700
Apache is pretty strict about their license. I've never seen a dual license
in an Apache repository. What exactly do you want to do? I can bring it up
on the legal discussion group at Apache...
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Martin Scott Nicklous <
> I put a new master branch and also the corresponding apidocs update up on
> the github portletspec3 repo containing the updates for PORTLETSPEC3-9. I
> incorporated Neil's suggestion to always use "returned URL" rather than
> sometimes "new URL" and other times "returned URL". We can talk about this
> next week. If additional changes need to be made, naturally we'll make
> I also added references to the copyright & license as per Werner's
> suggestion. The copyright text is identical to the current copyright for
> the JSR 286 APIs on Apache for now. That text is likely not final - I'm in
> contact with IBM legal to determine exactly what should be in there.
> David - the copyright text is an Apache copyright that refers to the
> original IBM copyright. It might be good if you could contact the Apache
> legal folks to get their point of view on the required new copyright
> contents for version 3.